Minha opinião:
A tv mostra protestos de paquistaneses de todas as idades que querem o bloqueio do facebook e do youtube no Paquistão.
Não seria o bloqueio de tal site um passo extremo? (para não dizer extremista)
uê sé tem coisas ruins nos sites? Estão todas as pessoas fazendo dezenhos pornográficos de profetas? E as pessoas que gostam, necessitam para falar com seus familiares e amigos, ou trabalham com tais sites?
Quem fez os tais desenhos será punido? Acho que não... mas gente que gosta dos tais sites sim.. ue
Foi pedido que os desenhos fossem retirados, porém isso foi negado pelo adm do fb... errado? não sei, liberdade de expressão? talvez.. mas quando se ofende raça, religião de alguém eu acho que isso deveria ir para a corte e ser resolvido assim, judicialmente.
Assim o Paquistão fica com mais fama de extremista, cade a democracia? Sites pornos tem em todos os lugares, você abre se você quer, isso é liberdade de escolha.. mas vai fazer o povo entender isso
volta o povão todo para o orkut hehehhee
se você não entendeu bulhufas do que eu disse dê uma olhadinha aqui:
http://tecnologia.terra.com.br/noticias/0,,OI4440796-EI12884,00.html
Depois do Facebook, Paquistão bloqueia acesso ao YouTube
O Paquistão bloqueou o site de compartilhamento de vídeos YouTube na tentativa de controlar o acesso a conteúdo "blasfemo", anunciaram autoridades do país nesta quinta-feira.
A proibição aconteceu após a Autoridade de Telecomunicações do Paquistão (PTA) orientar provedores de internet a bloquear indefinidamente o acesso à rede social Facebook na quarta-feira, em decorrência de um concurso online de desenho do profeta Maomé.
Toda representação do profeta é considerada como contrária ao Islã e uma blasfêmia pelos muçulmanos.
Wahaj-us-Siraj, presidente do provedor de internet Nayatel, disse que a PTA enviou uma ordem na noite de quarta-feira exigindo o bloqueio "imediato" do YouTube. O YouTube já havia sido bloqueado no Paquistão em 2007, durante cerca de um ano.
Showing posts with label governo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label governo. Show all posts
Thursday, 20 May 2010
Wednesday, 1 July 2009
Pobreza- algo a se pensar
Lado B
80 %Pakistanis spending 50-60 % of their total income on food have been forced to curtail clothing, health education expenses to stave off starvation...
Nao ha muito pra se falar, talvez quase nada que possamos fazer..
80 %Pakistanis spending 50-60 % of their total income on food have been forced to curtail clothing, health education expenses to stave off starvation...Not everyone who is poor was born into poverty. New research shows that large numbers of poor people have fallen into poverty within their lifetimes as is happening in recent months in Pakistan where poverty is on rise due to food inflation and shortages.
Any inflationary impact that increases the rates of food badly impacts majority of people living in Pakistan as more than 80 per cent of them earn less than $2 per day (isso mesmo menos de 2 dolares por dia..). They are more vulnerable than the affluent class because they spend 50-60 per cent of their total income on food. When food becomes expensive they have to curtail other essential expenses to save themselves from starvation. It is time for starvation for those 23.4 per cent of the population that the government officially recognizes at living below poverty line.
Conventionally, poverty has been measured as a stock, considering the numbers of poor people at a particular moment in time. Such stocks can be compared across two points in time and the net change calculated. Such analysis does not reveal, however, exactly how this change was derived: how many people fell into poverty within the specified time frame, and how many others concurrently escaped poverty?
Poverty is definitely on rise in Pakistan as its citizen fight to buy wheat, rice or ghee at whatever price they could get it. Price has lost significance, as it is the availability that matters. Past experience indicates that poverty rises sharply in these circumstances. This according to economic experts is the right time to assess the poverty in the country, which would give the planners an insight to the vulnerable population of the country that could fall into poverty on slightest disturbance in economic out look.
The experts point out that except fixed income groups or elite class majority of families in Pakistan buy food on daily basis. There are families in poor localities that do not afford to buy as 20 kg atta bag. In normal circumstances they used to buy one or two kg of this commodity on daily basis or the shopkeeper in their neighbourhood provided them the 20 kg bag on credit.
They said now that the atta is not available through normal retail channels. They have to buy atta now at cash and that too at much higher rates. The alternate staple food to atta is rice the rates of which have risen more sharply.
Almost doubling of edible oil rates in one year and historic high rates of vegetables have further compounded the problems of lower middleclass and poor families. The poor families have been forced to neglect the health or education (acabam deixando de estudar porque nao tem como pagar..)if their children just to ensure that they are adequately fed.
Poor planning and bad governance has landed the nation in to present mess. According to economists the government�s poverty reduction strategy lacked substance. They said the government did not conduct any study (simples, se esqueceram deles, nem planos tinham) about the development and policy measures that reduce poverty. They said studies in neighboring India indicate that investment on road infrastructure reduces poverty more sharply then other developments. They said India experience shows that for every one million rupees spent on rural roads, 124 poor people could be lifted above the poverty line-the largest rate of poverty reduction among all types of investment. Furthermore, one rupee invested in rural roads would generate more than five rupees in returns from agricultural production, which is the second-largest production growth effect after agricultural research and development (R&D). Additional government spending on agricultural R&D and extension has the largest impact on production growth, with a cost- benefit ratio of 13; it also leads to large rural poverty-reduction benefits, second only to rural road investment. Additional government spending on education has the third-largest impact in reducing rural poverty, largely because of the increases in non-farm employment and rural wages that it induces. Finally, public investment in irrigation has an impact on agricultural productivity similar to that of education investments and only a small impact in reducing rural poverty. The economists regret that no such analysis is available in Pakistan.
Any inflationary impact that increases the rates of food badly impacts majority of people living in Pakistan as more than 80 per cent of them earn less than $2 per day (isso mesmo menos de 2 dolares por dia..). They are more vulnerable than the affluent class because they spend 50-60 per cent of their total income on food. When food becomes expensive they have to curtail other essential expenses to save themselves from starvation. It is time for starvation for those 23.4 per cent of the population that the government officially recognizes at living below poverty line.
Conventionally, poverty has been measured as a stock, considering the numbers of poor people at a particular moment in time. Such stocks can be compared across two points in time and the net change calculated. Such analysis does not reveal, however, exactly how this change was derived: how many people fell into poverty within the specified time frame, and how many others concurrently escaped poverty?
Poverty is definitely on rise in Pakistan as its citizen fight to buy wheat, rice or ghee at whatever price they could get it. Price has lost significance, as it is the availability that matters. Past experience indicates that poverty rises sharply in these circumstances. This according to economic experts is the right time to assess the poverty in the country, which would give the planners an insight to the vulnerable population of the country that could fall into poverty on slightest disturbance in economic out look.
The experts point out that except fixed income groups or elite class majority of families in Pakistan buy food on daily basis. There are families in poor localities that do not afford to buy as 20 kg atta bag. In normal circumstances they used to buy one or two kg of this commodity on daily basis or the shopkeeper in their neighbourhood provided them the 20 kg bag on credit.They said now that the atta is not available through normal retail channels. They have to buy atta now at cash and that too at much higher rates. The alternate staple food to atta is rice the rates of which have risen more sharply.
Almost doubling of edible oil rates in one year and historic high rates of vegetables have further compounded the problems of lower middleclass and poor families. The poor families have been forced to neglect the health or education (acabam deixando de estudar porque nao tem como pagar..)if their children just to ensure that they are adequately fed.
Poor planning and bad governance has landed the nation in to present mess. According to economists the government�s poverty reduction strategy lacked substance. They said the government did not conduct any study (simples, se esqueceram deles, nem planos tinham) about the development and policy measures that reduce poverty. They said studies in neighboring India indicate that investment on road infrastructure reduces poverty more sharply then other developments. They said India experience shows that for every one million rupees spent on rural roads, 124 poor people could be lifted above the poverty line-the largest rate of poverty reduction among all types of investment. Furthermore, one rupee invested in rural roads would generate more than five rupees in returns from agricultural production, which is the second-largest production growth effect after agricultural research and development (R&D). Additional government spending on agricultural R&D and extension has the largest impact on production growth, with a cost- benefit ratio of 13; it also leads to large rural poverty-reduction benefits, second only to rural road investment. Additional government spending on education has the third-largest impact in reducing rural poverty, largely because of the increases in non-farm employment and rural wages that it induces. Finally, public investment in irrigation has an impact on agricultural productivity similar to that of education investments and only a small impact in reducing rural poverty. The economists regret that no such analysis is available in Pakistan.
Me diz se num eh uma droga de governo???? O cara foi capaz de matar a propria mulher (Benazir), porque ele iria se importar com seu pais?
Melhor Musharraf do que nada:
Melhor Musharraf do que nada:
“POVERTY DECREASED DURING MUSHARRAF ERA”
According to Economic Survey 2005 & CIA Factbook 2007. Poverty in Pakistan in 2001 was 34.46%. And, now after 7 years of Musharraf; Poverty in 2005 was 23.9%. Poverty DECREASED by 10.56%.
Overall, 12 million people have been pushed out of Poverty in 2001 -2005!
According to Economic Survey 2005 & CIA Factbook 2007. Poverty in Pakistan in 2001 was 34.46%. And, now after 7 years of Musharraf; Poverty in 2005 was 23.9%. Poverty DECREASED by 10.56%.
Overall, 12 million people have been pushed out of Poverty in 2001 -2005!
No Pak existem muitas pessoas pedindo dinheiro nas ruas, mas eles num pedem como aqui, elas dizem, me de um trocado que eu te abencoo, que eu rezo por voce, ou eu preciso de um uniforme da escola, algum material, ...
Mas existem alguns tipos de exploradores, para quem assistiu `Quem quer ser um Milionario` viu que eles pegam algumas criancas e bebes e os colocam para pedir esmola, no pak acontece o mesmo, infelizmente. 
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
